Monday Morning Brief (29 May - 1 June 2025)

Russia and Ukraine to hold peace talks in Turkey, Trump proceeds on his Golden Dome project, and the U.S. will retain a key NATO leadership position.

Curated foreign policy and national security news for professionals.

Good morning,

This is the Monday morning edition of The Intel Brief. Let’s review some key geopolitical updates from the weekend.

Reporting Period: 29 May - 1 June 2025

Bottom-Line Up Front:

1. Today, 2 June, Russia and Ukraine are scheduled to engage in peace talks in Istanbul, Turkey. It is uncertain what is on the agenda, but Ukraine and its Western partners have shed doubt on Russia’s desire for substantive peace. Previous negotiations results in a prisoner exchange deal.

2. President Trump's ambitious "Golden Dome" missile defense project aims to establish a comprehensive, space-based shield to protect the United States from global missile threats. Estimated at $175 billion, the initiative is led by U.S. Space Force General Guetlein. Trump’s goal is for the system to be fully operational capable by the end of his term.

3. On 30 May, Reuters reported the President Trump has committed to appoint the next European Commander (EUCOM) to also serve as the Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR). The decision has been communicated to NATO Secretary General Rutte, keeping in line with America’s operational control over NATO since 1951.

Reading online and want to subscribe? Click HERE!

Today: Russia-Ukraine Peace Talks In Turkey

Summary
Today, 2 June, Russia and Ukraine are scheduled to engage in peace talks in Istanbul, Turkey. It is uncertain what is on the agenda, but Ukraine and its Western partners have shed doubt on Russia’s desire for substantive peace. Previous negotiations results in a prisoner exchange deal.

Findings

  • Background: The first talks between Russia and Ukraine since 2022 were held in Istanbul on 16 May. Those talks resulted in a prisoner exchange and an agreement to meet for future talks.

  • New Talks: The second round of talks was originally proposed by Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov, who stated Russia has prepared a memorandum detailing its position on resolving the conflict.
    Ukraine was slow to agree to the 2 June talks and requested a proposed agenda to ensure the efforts are substantive.
    International leaders, such as President Trump and host President Erdogan, have stated their desire for the talks to occur at higher diplomatic levels.

  • Military Developments: The potential outcome of negotiations is complicated by Russia’s recent military activity. Russia has seized additional Ukrainian territories, including Novopil in Donetsk and Vodolahy in Sumy, raising concerns about a potential new ground offensive. Russia has also launched various large-scale drone attacks on Ukraine, including Kyiv and other civilian centers. Ukraine has countered with large-scale strikes of its own, with Germany being the fifth NATO nation to approve long-range strikes into Russia with Western-supplied weapons.

  • Russian Demands: While Russia’s demands are likely to be reflected in their memorandum in today’s meeting, Putin and the Kremlin have already issued concerns that Moscow would like addressed; things Putin has phrased at “root causes” behind the war.
    Recently, those include NATO expansion and the establishment of a Russian-occupied “buffer zone” in Ukraine.

  • Sanctions and Economic Measures: U.S. Senator Graham announced plans for a bipartisan sanctions bill targeting Russia, including a 500% tariff on goods from countries purchasing Russian energy, aiming to pressure Moscow into genuine peace talks. These follow the EU’s 17th sanctions package, with Brussels already drafting an 18th.
    Senators Graham and Blumenthal met with Zelenskyy in Kyiv on 1 June ahead of negotiations.

Why This Matters
The proposed talks in Istanbul represent a critical juncture in the ongoing conflict. While diplomatic efforts are underway, the lack of mutual trust and ongoing military actions pose significant challenges to achieving a sustainable peace. The involvement of international actors, including the U.S. and Turkey, underscores the global implications of the conflict and the urgency of finding a resolution.

President Trump’s Golden Dome Project Proceeds

Summary
President Trump's ambitious "Golden Dome" missile defense project aims to establish a comprehensive, space-based shield to protect the United States from global missile threats. Estimated at $175 billion, the initiative is led by U.S. Space Force General Guetlein. Trump’s goal is for the system to be fully operational capable by the end of his term.

Findings

  • Project Overview: Announced on May 20, 2025, the Golden Dome is envisioned as a multilayered defense system utilizing a constellation of satellites equipped with sensors and interceptors to detect and neutralize ballistic, hypersonic, and cruise missiles globally.

  • Leadership and Funding: General Michael Guetlein has been appointed to oversee the project. An initial allocation of $24.7 billion has been approved by Congress to commence the initiative, with total costs projected to reach $175 billion.

  • Technological and Logistical Challenges: The project faces significant hurdles, including the development of reliable space-based interceptors, integration of complex systems, and potential supply chain constraints. Analysts suggest that achieving full operational status within the proposed timeframe is unlikely.

  • International Reactions: The Golden Dome has elicited strong responses from global powers. Russia and China have criticized the initiative as destabilizing and a potential catalyst for a new arms race in space. North Korea has labeled it a "space nuclear war scenario," expressing concerns over the militarization of outer space.

  • Canadian Involvement: President Trump proposed that Canada could join the Golden Dome program for a fee of $61 billion or by becoming the 51st U.S. state. Canada has rejected both options, emphasizing its sovereignty and expressing interest only in potential partnerships.

Why This Matters
The Golden Dome represents a significant shift in U.S. defense strategy, emphasizing space-based missile defense capabilities. While aiming to enhance national security, the project's ambitious scope, technological demands, and international ramifications raise critical questions about its viability and impact on global strategic stability.

Trump To Keep With Tradition, Next European Commander To Lead NATO

Summary
On 30 May, Reuters reported the President Trump has committed to appoint the next European Commander (EUCOM) to also serve as the Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR). The decision has been communicated to NATO Secretary General Rutte, keeping in line with America’s operational control over NATO since 1951.

Findings

  • Background: The SACEUR billet was created after World War II to coordinate all European military operations. Dwight D. Eisenhower was the first SACEUR in 1951. It has remained an role exclusively for American military personnel, highlighting Washington’s leading role in the organization.

  • Reporting: On 30 May Reuters reported that Trump had voiced this intention to Secretary General Rutte. Reuters was notified of the decision by three anonymous U.S. officials and one NATO official.

  • Most Likely Pick: Reuters and Russia’s TASS news agency report that USAF Lieutenant General Grynkewich is the leading candidate for SACEUR.

Why This Matters
Despite the significance of the role, the decision may seem like a standard appointment. However, Trump’s decision to align with tradition — by keeping the EUCOM and SACEUR role tied together — signals U.S. commitments to NATO at a time when Washington is shifting focus to the Pacific.

There has been consistent speculation that as the Trump admin calls for Europe to oversee its own security, that the U.S. could cut funding and withdraw troops. Early and extreme reporting even suggested that Trump would pull the U.S. out of NATO. But this decision shows that (likely for the duration of Trump’s term) the U.S. will retain its position and mutual interests in Europe.

TASS reporting on the decision is also significant, as it could undermine Russia’s desire to seek U.S. mediation in Ukraine negotiations. It also signals to Russia that despite whatever bilateral conversations occur behind closed doors, the U.S. is not retreating from its historical foreign policy interests and practices; that NATO will remain as a core to U.S. foreign policy in Europe.

End Brief

That concludes this brief. Thank you for reading.

Can you do me a favor? Consider forwarding this brief to a friend or colleague who would find it valuable. It’s easy!

  • Scroll to the top of the page

  • In the email, select “Forward”

  • Enter the email you want to send it to

  • Hit “send”

Thanks!

Nick

This publication is an Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) product and does not contain Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) or Classified Information.